Rusk, Texas hotel market

Cherokee County · Measured room revenue from state hotel occupancy tax filings, through May 2026.

$842k
Room revenue, trailing 12 months
+2.4%
vs prior 12 months
$29
Market RevPAR, TTM*
3
Hotels filing room tax
79
Registry rooms
0
Rooms added YoY
12.7%
Short-term-rental share
Demand momentumFlatSupply pressureStableDemand durabilityStableSTR spilloverLowData confidenceMedium-high

Quarterly hotel room revenue

state filings
$100k$200k2017 Q1: $48,74020172017 Q2: $66,0412017 Q3: $58,2002017 Q4: $49,2652018 Q1: $58,81020182018 Q2: $81,9832018 Q3: $78,2762018 Q4: $78,6512019 Q1: $82,81020192019 Q2: $184,3682019 Q3: $158,0422019 Q4: $135,6842020 Q1: $93,93620202020 Q2: $108,0792020 Q3: $180,4422020 Q4: $157,1372021 Q1: $174,19020212021 Q2: $202,3432021 Q3: $215,5602021 Q4: $228,0492022 Q1: $255,24820222022 Q2: $265,1952022 Q3: $248,1652022 Q4: $216,9362023 Q1: $192,20920232023 Q2: $204,2792023 Q3: $211,8062023 Q4: $226,5682024 Q1: $194,34020242024 Q2: $244,3402024 Q3: $217,0542024 Q4: $200,1982025 Q1: $172,72220252025 Q2: $232,8582025 Q3: $224,2922025 Q4: $195,0992026 Q1: $199,7282026$200k

Room receipts reported by Rusk hotels to the Texas Comptroller, summed by calendar quarter so monthly and quarterly filers land in the same buckets. Short-term rentals are excluded and measured separately. *Market RevPAR divides trailing revenue by registry rooms x 365; registry capacity can lag renovations.

Short-term-rental share

measured
10%2017: 12.9% STR share'172018: 12.5% STR share2019: 7.5% STR share'192020: 7% STR share2021: 8.3% STR share'212022: 4.2% STR share2023: 5% STR share'232024: 9.3% STR share2025: 13.5% STR share'252026: 10.2% STR share (5 months)10.2%

STR share of all measured lodging revenue: platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo, Vacasa) plus individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Open dots are partial years.

Hotels in Rusk

3 filing locations
3 hotelsCombined TTM $842kMedian $/key $8kMedian YoY -0.8%
HotelBrand familyRoomsFY2025 revenueTTM revenue$/keyYoY
Weston Inn & SuitesIndependent41$533k$557k$14k+5.2%Screen
Executive InnIndependent30$250k$238k$8k-6.8%Screen
Rusk Koa · quarterly filerIndependent8$42k$47k$6kScreen

Every hotel and motel filing state room tax in Rusk, ranked by trailing-12-month reported receipts. Brand and tier are read from the filing name; $/key divides TTM revenue by registry rooms. Quarterly filers report at quarter granularity, so their trailing windows can lag by up to two months.

Hotels vs short-term rentals

measured · state filings
YearHotel revenueSTR revenueSTR share
2026 (5mo)$339k$39k10.2%
2025$825k$129k13.5%
2024$856k$88k9.3%
2023$835k$43k5%
2022$986k$43k4.2%
2021$820k$74k8.3%
2020$540k$40k7%
2019$561k$45k7.5%
2018$298k$43k12.5%
2017$222k$33k12.9%

Short-term-rental revenue combines platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo and similar file one aggregate per city) and individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Revenue is measured; listing counts are not derivable from tax filings.

Cherokee County context

Census ACS + CBP
Population (2023)51,143 · +0.5% since 2013
Median household income$59,830 · was $38,378 in 2013
Median age38.2
Health care and social assistance2,236 employed · 72 establishments
Accommodation and food services1,070 employed · 74 establishments
Construction712 employed · 73 establishments
Other services (except public administration)436 employed · 86 establishments

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and County Business Patterns, county level. Employment counts are private-sector payroll establishments.

Screen a specific hotel

A screening turns one property's public record into a cited report: monthly revenue back to 2017, ownership and franchise research, competitive set, hazard history, and the market context on this page. New accounts get 3 free screenings.

Search Rusk hotels

Methodology. Measured from TX Comptroller hotel occupancy tax filings. Corporate housing operators, condo/HOA rental regimes, RV parks, and vacation-rental managers are classified out of the hotel universe by name; hand corrections via override_class win over the computed class. Self-reported and unaudited; amended filings restate history. Registry room capacity can lag renovations. Growth figures need full 12-month coverage in both years; partial-coverage locations show revenue but no growth rate. Quarterly filers are included at quarter granularity: their trailing windows can lag monthly filers by up to two months. Market growth rates substitute a typical month for detector-flagged single-month filing anomalies (amended filings lumped into one month); raw revenue totals stay as filed. Registry room counts that are impossible for the building (a re-registered permit filing 18,872 units against 188) fall back to the last plausible count filed at the same address, or are withheld from room totals when no such filing exists. Room and hotel counts are per building: when a hotel changes filing entities, its co-located registrations count once, at the most recently seen plausible room count, while revenue sums across every filer. Platform rows are city-level aggregates remitted by booking platforms (Airbnb, Vrbo/HomeAway, and similar) under marketplace agreements; they carry real revenue but placeholder unit counts, so listing counts are NOT derivable from this data. Individual-filer figures capture hosts with their own tax permits plus vacation-rental managers and condo rental programs classified by name (one manager can file many locations under one permit); corporate housing operators and RV parks are excluded from both sides. A host who files individually may also have some bookings remitted by a platform, so minor double counting is possible. The small-property heuristic (<=4 units) can misclassify tiny B&Bs or motels. All figures are self-reported, unaudited, and restated by amended filings. Figures are our interpretation of public state records and are not a valuation or investment advice.

All Texas hotel markets