Ranger, Texas hotel market

Eastland County · Measured room revenue from state hotel occupancy tax filings, through May 2026.

$641k
Room revenue, trailing 12 months
+40.0%
vs prior 12 months
$33
Market RevPAR, TTM*
3
Hotels filing room tax
53
Registry rooms
0
Rooms added YoY
22.7%
Short-term-rental share
Demand momentumVery highSupply pressureStableDemand durabilityElevated riskSTR spilloverModerateData confidenceMedium-high

Quarterly hotel room revenue

state filings
$50k$100k$150k2017 Q1: $29,90020172017 Q2: $30,5332017 Q3: $46,3472017 Q4: $51,1762018 Q1: $69,42720182018 Q2: $77,5572018 Q3: $70,7272018 Q4: $63,7822019 Q1: $55,87420192019 Q2: $69,4562019 Q3: $49,8512019 Q4: $48,6492020 Q1: $48,49420202020 Q2: $43,6162020 Q3: $40,0692020 Q4: $10,5512021 Q1: $12,50020212021 Q2: $22,8502021 Q3: $37,6932021 Q4: $49,8892022 Q1: $59,93720222022 Q2: $60,3472022 Q3: $60,3562022 Q4: $83,5722023 Q1: $76,80120232023 Q2: $75,5742023 Q3: $87,2252023 Q4: $73,6012024 Q1: $118,14920242024 Q2: $157,9932024 Q3: $95,8832024 Q4: $42,2212025 Q1: $159,50420252025 Q2: $161,3042025 Q3: $167,3902025 Q4: $159,4042026 Q1: $153,3602026$153k

Room receipts reported by Ranger hotels to the Texas Comptroller, summed by calendar quarter so monthly and quarterly filers land in the same buckets. Short-term rentals are excluded and measured separately. *Market RevPAR divides trailing revenue by registry rooms x 365; registry capacity can lag renovations.

Short-term-rental share

measured
20%2017: 0% STR share'172018: 2.4% STR share2019: 2.3% STR share'192020: 12.4% STR share2021: 22.7% STR share'212022: 6% STR share2023: 11.6% STR share'232024: 17.5% STR share2025: 19.4% STR share'252026: 25% STR share (5 months)25%

STR share of all measured lodging revenue: platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo, Vacasa) plus individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Open dots are partial years.

Hotels in Ranger

3 filing locations
3 hotelsCombined TTM $641kMedian $/key $5kMedian YoY +24.5%
HotelBrand familyRoomsFY2025 revenueTTM revenue$/keyYoY
Rodeway InnChoice30$560k$560k$19k+50.8%Screen
Relax Inn · quarterly filerIndependent16$80k$79k$5k-1.7%Screen
Russel Creek Crossing, LLC · quarterly filerIndependent7$8k$3k$378Screen

Every hotel and motel filing state room tax in Ranger, ranked by trailing-12-month reported receipts. Brand and tier are read from the filing name; $/key divides TTM revenue by registry rooms. Quarterly filers report at quarter granularity, so their trailing windows can lag by up to two months.

Hotels vs short-term rentals

measured · state filings
YearHotel revenueSTR revenueSTR share
2026 (5mo)$247k$82k25%
2025$648k$156k19.4%
2024$414k$88k17.5%
2023$313k$41k11.6%
2022$264k$17k6%
2021$123k$36k22.7%
2020$143k$20k12.4%
2019$224k$5k2.3%
2018$281k$7k2.4%
2017$158k$460%

Short-term-rental revenue combines platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo and similar file one aggregate per city) and individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Revenue is measured; listing counts are not derivable from tax filings.

Eastland County context

Census ACS + CBP
Population (2023)17,846 · -3.4% since 2013
Median household income$51,741 · was $34,914 in 2013
Median age42.6
Construction686 employed · 42 establishments
Health care and social assistance645 employed · 45 establishments
Accommodation and food services548 employed · 57 establishments
Other services (except public administration)269 employed · 59 establishments

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and County Business Patterns, county level. Employment counts are private-sector payroll establishments.

Screen a specific hotel

A screening turns one property's public record into a cited report: monthly revenue back to 2017, ownership and franchise research, competitive set, hazard history, and the market context on this page. New accounts get 3 free screenings.

Search Ranger hotels

Methodology. Measured from TX Comptroller hotel occupancy tax filings. Corporate housing operators, condo/HOA rental regimes, RV parks, and vacation-rental managers are classified out of the hotel universe by name; hand corrections via override_class win over the computed class. Self-reported and unaudited; amended filings restate history. Registry room capacity can lag renovations. Growth figures need full 12-month coverage in both years; partial-coverage locations show revenue but no growth rate. Quarterly filers are included at quarter granularity: their trailing windows can lag monthly filers by up to two months. Market growth rates substitute a typical month for detector-flagged single-month filing anomalies (amended filings lumped into one month); raw revenue totals stay as filed. Registry room counts that are impossible for the building (a re-registered permit filing 18,872 units against 188) fall back to the last plausible count filed at the same address, or are withheld from room totals when no such filing exists. Room and hotel counts are per building: when a hotel changes filing entities, its co-located registrations count once, at the most recently seen plausible room count, while revenue sums across every filer. Platform rows are city-level aggregates remitted by booking platforms (Airbnb, Vrbo/HomeAway, and similar) under marketplace agreements; they carry real revenue but placeholder unit counts, so listing counts are NOT derivable from this data. Individual-filer figures capture hosts with their own tax permits plus vacation-rental managers and condo rental programs classified by name (one manager can file many locations under one permit); corporate housing operators and RV parks are excluded from both sides. A host who files individually may also have some bookings remitted by a platform, so minor double counting is possible. The small-property heuristic (<=4 units) can misclassify tiny B&Bs or motels. All figures are self-reported, unaudited, and restated by amended filings. Figures are our interpretation of public state records and are not a valuation or investment advice.

All Texas hotel markets