Haskell, Texas hotel market

Haskell County · Measured room revenue from state hotel occupancy tax filings, through May 2026.

$1.8M
Room revenue, trailing 12 months
+72.1%
vs prior 12 months
$63
Market RevPAR, TTM*
3
Hotels filing room tax
77
Registry rooms
0
Rooms added YoY
11.9%
Short-term-rental share
Demand momentumVery highSupply pressureStableDemand durabilityElevated riskSTR spilloverLowData confidenceMedium-high

Quarterly hotel room revenue

state filings
$200k$400k2017 Q1: $171,86820172017 Q2: $303,5872017 Q3: $321,4652017 Q4: $201,4212018 Q1: $209,09120182018 Q2: $201,1892018 Q3: $219,1032018 Q4: $229,8822019 Q1: $267,34120192019 Q2: $232,9812019 Q3: $248,7392019 Q4: $251,0752020 Q1: $176,91920202020 Q2: $217,4422020 Q3: $219,3742020 Q4: $257,3682021 Q1: $311,61720212021 Q2: $384,3172021 Q3: $431,8552021 Q4: $242,5302022 Q1: $177,57220222022 Q2: $274,0142022 Q3: $315,6322022 Q4: $194,4752023 Q1: $130,53520232023 Q2: $212,4142023 Q3: $224,3312023 Q4: $103,7622024 Q1: $128,76320242024 Q2: $212,6042024 Q3: $191,9132024 Q4: $226,7112025 Q1: $327,40920252025 Q2: $407,2162025 Q3: $455,8242025 Q4: $428,0802026 Q1: $440,1082026$440k

Room receipts reported by Haskell hotels to the Texas Comptroller, summed by calendar quarter so monthly and quarterly filers land in the same buckets. Short-term rentals are excluded and measured separately. *Market RevPAR divides trailing revenue by registry rooms x 365; registry capacity can lag renovations.

Short-term-rental share

measured
10%20%2017: 2.5% STR share'172018: 3.1% STR share2019: 3% STR share'192020: 2.2% STR share2021: 4.4% STR share'212022: 5.6% STR share2023: 16.9% STR share'232024: 19.1% STR share2025: 11.2% STR share'252026: 13.3% STR share (5 months)13.3%

STR share of all measured lodging revenue: platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo, Vacasa) plus individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Open dots are partial years.

Hotels in Haskell

3 filing locations
3 hotelsCombined TTM $1.8MMedian $/key $23kMedian YoY +72.1%
HotelBrand familyRoomsFY2025 revenueTTM revenue$/keyYoY
Shreenath Properties LLC/Dba Ameristay Inn & SuiteIndependent45$1.1M$1.1M$25k+38.1%Screen
Haskell InnIndependent17$303k$387k$23k+106.1%Screen
Pecan Springs Lodge · quarterly filerIndependent15$251k$285k$19kScreen

Every hotel and motel filing state room tax in Haskell, ranked by trailing-12-month reported receipts. Brand and tier are read from the filing name; $/key divides TTM revenue by registry rooms. Quarterly filers report at quarter granularity, so their trailing windows can lag by up to two months.

Hotels vs short-term rentals

measured · state filings
YearHotel revenueSTR revenueSTR share
2026 (5mo)$704k$108k13.3%
2025$1.6M$205k11.2%
2024$760k$180k19.1%
2023$671k$137k16.9%
2022$962k$57k5.6%
2021$1.4M$63k4.4%
2020$871k$19k2.2%
2019$1.0M$31k3%
2018$859k$27k3.1%
2017$998k$25k2.5%

Short-term-rental revenue combines platform remittances (Airbnb, Vrbo and similar file one aggregate per city) and individually permitted hosts and rental managers. Revenue is measured; listing counts are not derivable from tax filings.

Haskell County context

Census ACS + CBP
Population (2023)5,390 · -8.4% since 2013
Median household income$54,044 · was $36,857 in 2013
Median age44.3
Health care and social assistance151 employed · 5 establishments
Accommodation and food services127 employed · 16 establishments
Other services (except public administration)66 employed · 27 establishments
Finance and insurance56 employed · 12 establishments

American Community Survey 5-year estimates and County Business Patterns, county level. Employment counts are private-sector payroll establishments.

Screen a specific hotel

A screening turns one property's public record into a cited report: monthly revenue back to 2017, ownership and franchise research, competitive set, hazard history, and the market context on this page. New accounts get 3 free screenings.

Search Haskell hotels

Methodology. Measured from TX Comptroller hotel occupancy tax filings. Corporate housing operators, condo/HOA rental regimes, RV parks, and vacation-rental managers are classified out of the hotel universe by name; hand corrections via override_class win over the computed class. Self-reported and unaudited; amended filings restate history. Registry room capacity can lag renovations. Growth figures need full 12-month coverage in both years; partial-coverage locations show revenue but no growth rate. Quarterly filers are included at quarter granularity: their trailing windows can lag monthly filers by up to two months. Market growth rates substitute a typical month for detector-flagged single-month filing anomalies (amended filings lumped into one month); raw revenue totals stay as filed. Registry room counts that are impossible for the building (a re-registered permit filing 18,872 units against 188) fall back to the last plausible count filed at the same address, or are withheld from room totals when no such filing exists. Room and hotel counts are per building: when a hotel changes filing entities, its co-located registrations count once, at the most recently seen plausible room count, while revenue sums across every filer. Platform rows are city-level aggregates remitted by booking platforms (Airbnb, Vrbo/HomeAway, and similar) under marketplace agreements; they carry real revenue but placeholder unit counts, so listing counts are NOT derivable from this data. Individual-filer figures capture hosts with their own tax permits plus vacation-rental managers and condo rental programs classified by name (one manager can file many locations under one permit); corporate housing operators and RV parks are excluded from both sides. A host who files individually may also have some bookings remitted by a platform, so minor double counting is possible. The small-property heuristic (<=4 units) can misclassify tiny B&Bs or motels. All figures are self-reported, unaudited, and restated by amended filings. Figures are our interpretation of public state records and are not a valuation or investment advice.

All Texas hotel markets